@omg: Back to the Future

This is the familiar cover of the second edition of New Atlantis, and its only cover because New Atlantis was originally published at the back of another book with a different title.

 

PART I. REWRITTEN TEXT FOR leonardodvinci.tv

Because this is the only page up while the author finishes setting up to tranfer an insane amount of data to this website, he will allow the readers to watch him write in public one last time. To aid those interested in doing so, the last date and time this page was updated is posted at the top of the page. He had to install a special WordPress “plugin” to do this. The last update date and time is reliable and always accurate.

 

There are two meanings involved here. Which of these two meanings applies to Apophenia Productions and An Apocalyptic Synthesis is something the reader must decide.

 

Screenshot from Apophenia Productions website captured on November 9, 2022. The author has become adept at spotting these guys. Rosicrucians come in all flavors and thrive in every culture on the planet, but here in San Antonio, Texas, their International headquarters, the men have a strong affinity for the “bun” hairstyle perhaps because they were at sea as pirates for well over a century. They are a tough lot. And their leaders are the most intelligent people the author has ever encountered in his 64 years of living among animals. You do not want them angry at you.

Apophenia Productions


The YouTube video BACK TO THE FUTURE predicts 9/11 has been watched nearly five million times since it was posted on YouTube. This paper picks up where they left off and fully analyses the movie Back to the Future as well as Tomorrowland and The Walk. These three movies form the backbone of what the author likes to call a “fireworks display” of end-time warnings the public completely missed. Analyzing these movies is only a part of what the author discusses in this paper, but it is an important part.

The release date of Back to the Future is perhaps the most important thing Apophenia Productions missed. The release dates of all four movies discussed at length in this paper are immensely important. For example, the release date of The Black Hole, a movie referenced in Tomorrowland, is 1979. 1979 + 43 = 2022. If you do that with the date on which the Georgia Guidestones monument was unveiled the following year, you get 1980 + 43 = 2023. I believe that was a deathtrap set for the Scottish Rite Freemasons by their banking class overlords. When the author finishes his work on THE FINAL SIGNATURE: Why was 2015 so important to the Rosicrucians?, he expects to find the release date of Back to the Future an integral part of the equation. But what about the release date of BACK TO THE FUTURE predicts 9/11 on July 27, 2015. If, as the author contends, the Rosicrucians seed thought so that people like me can tell others, would not the release date of BACK TO THE FUTURE predicts 9/11 be equally important? OMG, yes! July 27 is 727, a prime number, but not just any prime number. It is in the all-important 9th column of the primes table.

727 is the 129th prime blocking off 63 cells in the table.

What is of significance here is that it is the 7th column in the 9th row of the primes table. Primes above the first 100 are technically outside of the table, but they do get used in important situations like this one. 79 is itself prime. It is the 22nd prime and further confirmation that the other beast of the Apocalypse, an Earth crustal displacement, is weeks away. When I saw this, my suspicions that Apophenia Productions is a Rosicrucian operation crossed over into fact. They were seeding the Internet. The author is the only one who heard them. It is not too late for you, dear reader. Listen. Listening is life. Everything else is death.

But please sit down because if what I am about to say doesn’t give you a reason to pause and accept An Apocalypse Synthesis at a whole new level, nothing will. This shocked even me when I finally discovered why the Ћinkers released Back to the Future on July 3, 1985. And I do mean finally. This took years. All I knew was that they released the movie the day before Independence Day for a specific reason.

This is the date difference between the released date of Back to the Future on July 3, 1985, and the destruction of the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001 (“9/11”)

The main purpose of Back to the Future is to tell Rosicrucians worldwide that the banking class intended to destroy the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001 some 16 years, 2 months, and 8 days into the future. This and a bunch of other stuff discussed on this page is what Apophenia Productions missed, but did they? Or were they merely seeding the Internet in the hopes that someone like the author would see the rest on their own? Why did everyone miss this? The author can answer that question. He is supposedly one of the most abstract thinkers alive. But even for him, this was difficult to piece together. It took years.

1628 is the year the familiar second edition of Sir Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis was published.

To reference the publication date of the first edition would be confusing because the book had a different name. To quote Wikipedia, “New Atlantis first appeared in the back of Sylva sylvarum, a rather thorny work of natural history that was published by William Rawley, Bacon’s secretary, chaplain and amanuensis in 1626.”

How can the author be so sure of himself? Is this apophenia? There is a little, what the author calls an “anti-cipher” built into the release date. You see, the movie was released one day before Independence Day, a release date that is calling attention to itself, at least for a Rosicrucian analyzing the movie. Likewise, 1628 references the second edition of New Atlantis, not the previous edition. Fully understanding this and what it means to the Rosicrucians is a prerequisite to feeling the full impact of this movie. The sheer genius of Back to the Future is its popular appeal, like using simple English gematria when everyone is looking for something like the Copiale cipher. This movie is second only to Tomorrowland in importance, and both are deadly serious communications to Rosicrucians worldwide. One tells them about the destruction of the World Trade Center a highly symbolic 16 years before it happened, and the other tells them when the world is going to end.

Why New Atlantis? Because the Rosicrucians are making a statement about Life in The United States of America. It’s really rather poetic, especially in light of the fact that the jumpers were planned in remembrance of what happened at Masada in AD 73. The world of the banking class is a nightmare for our species, one that will very soon be coming to an end.

THE FACT THAT THE DATE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE JULY 3, 1985 RELEASE DATE OF BACK TO THE FUTURE AND THE DESTRUCTION OF THE TWIN TOWERS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001, REFERENCES THE YEAR IN WHICH THE SECOND EDITION OF NEW ATLANTIS WAS PUBLISHED IS MORE THAN JUST POETIC. IT IS PROOF POSITIVE THAT THE BANKING CLASS DECIDED THE DATE ON THE ORIGINAL WORLD TRADE CENTER WAS TO BE DESTROYED LONG BEFORE WHAT THE PUBLIC KNOWS AS “9/11.” THE REASON THEY CHOSE THAT DATE IS DISCUSSED AT LENGTH ON MARKING THE PASSAGE OF TIME: 911 is the 156th prime, September 11, 2001 (“9/11”), and “For Whom the Bell Tolls”.

 

 

The Gunpowder Plot by Ron Embleton (1930-88)

Back to the Future and the Gunpowder Plot

The linking of Back to the Future and the Gunpowder Plot is arguably the main point of the entire movie. Why? Because history is repeating itself. Before there was September 11, 2001, there was November 5, 1605, which is remembered in the numeric symbolism of the Rosicrucians as the number 115. Had the Gunpowder Plot succeeded, there would have been no more Shakespeare plays (starting with Macbeth, which Sir Francis Bacon wrote in response to the Gunpowder Plot), no First Folio, and no Rosicrucians, an international organization of Christians that has for countless generations taken up the sword to curb the excesses of the banking class. The same international organization of Rosicrucians now has Denver, Colorado in military checkmate with the new hypersonic missile technology so that there will be no more “9/11” or COVID-19 shenanigans, and they will eventually end the banking class in Denver, Colorado if the apocalypse does not. They are living angels, and the Gunpowder Plot is a repeat of what happened at “the place of the skull.” They wanted to kill this nascent Ћinker movement in its crib. They almost succeeded. The reader must understand this because history attributes the Gunpowder Plot to the Jesuits. Over time, the Jesuits do become a distinct, second group within the progeny of Jove, but they began life as the bankers taking control of the Roman Catholic Church. We are talking about the bankers here, not the Jesuits. I will return to this subject momentarily.

Authorized (King James) Version

John 19:14-18
And it was the preparation of the passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King! But they cried out, Away with him, away with him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Cæsar. 16 Then delivered he him therefore unto them to be crucified.

And they took Jesus, and led him away. And he bearing his cross went forth into a place called the place of a skull, which is called in the Hebrew Golgotha: 18 where they crucified him, and two other with him, on either side one, and Jesus in the midst.

The public is naive about Skull and Bones. The Geronimo skulduggery hides a more sinister truth, one no one is supposed to know. The Roman elite killed Christ Jesus, and their successors, under whatever veil they hide, Knights Templar, Illuminati, Freemasons, or Skull and Bones, are proud of what their predecessors did. And understand this, these are families. These are bloodlines. These are the “gods many” of this world. The author states emphatically, that what they tell their progeny at Yale is the truth about the meaning of the skull. It is a reference to Golgotha, “the place of a skull.”

Would they do it again? They tried. There was a measure of the Christ in Sir Francis Bacon. What happened in Elizabethan England was more special than the world will ever know. And the banking class tried to end it with 36 barrels of gunpowder, the significance of which is astrological because there are 36 orbits of the Sun around the Solar system barycenter (called “Jose solar cycles”) in 13 baktuns, or one Maya Long Count “World Age.” The significance of the number 36 is well know to the progeny of Jove, a name Virgil gave to the Roman elite in the know, and to the Rosicrucians.

The is not a game. The future of our species is at stake. And that is why Back to the Future is referencing the Gunpowder Plot. How no one ever saw this bewilders the author. It is very much “in your face” at the start of the moive when the following image TAKES UP THE ENTIRE SCREEN, screaming for attention. A simple search for these two dates would have made the connection obvious to anyone who knows this movie was made by the Rosicrucians. The author can assure you, the people for whom this message about the coming destruction of the World Trade Center was intended, recognized these two dates instantly.

Yes, the Ћinkers want everyone to know who is really responsible for what happened on September 11, 2001, but nowadays anyone can do that. The truth is “9/11” was a sloppy operation. The controlled demolition of building seven made a mockery of us all. The bankers no longer care what we think because we are too close to the end. What the opening scene is trying to convey is that before September 11, 2001, there was November 5, 1605. The movie itself makes this clear by the strong emphasis placed on 1:15 AM in the opening scene followed by the transition of 1:15 AM to 1:16 AM (an upside-down and backward 911) at the mall. While still at the mall, a more direct reference is made to “9/11” using 1:19 AM (a backward 911), not once, but twice.

You can see this emphasis on the date of the Gunpowder Plot for yourself is this clip from the opening scene. I have captions on to emphasize the recurrence of 1:15 AM.

x

When you watch a movie like Back to the Future made by the Ћinkers, in-your-face numbers such as 1:15 AM and the images below are second only to deliberate mistakes as a way of getting your attention. You can be sure those numbers carry meaning. Pay particular attention to the second image because this is the one designed to erase any doubt whatsoever that November 5 is a reference to the Gunpowder Plot.

For the record, the name of this image file in the author WordPress database is “Gunpowder-Plot-numbers-from-Back-to-the-Future.webp”. Now here are those same two numbers from the first three paragraphs of Wikipedia’s article on the Gunpowder Plot.

Gunpowder Plot


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Gunpowder Plot of 1605, in earlier centuries often called the Gunpowder Treason Plot or the Jesuit Treason, was a failed assassination attempt against King James I by a group of provincial English Catholics led by Robert Catesby who sought to restore the Catholic monarchy from the Church of England after decades of persecution of Catholics.

The plan was to blow up the House of Lords during the State Opening of Parliament on 5 November 1605, as the prelude to a popular revolt in the Midlands during which James’s nine-year-old daughter, Elizabeth, was to be installed as the Catholic head of state. Catesby may have embarked on the scheme after hopes of securing greater religious tolerance under King James had faded, leaving many English Catholics disappointed. His fellow plotters were John and Christopher Wright, Robert and Thomas Wintour, Thomas Percy, Guy Fawkes, Robert Keyes, Thomas Bates, John Grant, Ambrose Rookwood, Sir Everard Digby and Francis Tresham. Fawkes, who had 10 years of military experience fighting in the Spanish Netherlands in the failed suppression of the Dutch Revolt, was given charge of the explosives.

The plot was revealed to the authorities in an anonymous letter sent to William Parker, 4th Baron Monteagle, on 26 October 1605. During a search of the House of Lords in the evening on 4 November 1605, Fawkes was discovered guarding 36 barrels of gunpowder—enough to reduce the House of Lords to rubble—and arrested. Most of the conspirators fled from London as they learned of the plot’s discovery, trying to enlist support along the way. Several made a stand against the pursuing Sheriff of Worcester and his men at Holbeche House; in the ensuing battle, Catesby was one of those shot and killed. At their trial on 27 January 1606, eight of the survivors, including Fawkes, were convicted and sentenced to be hanged, drawn and quartered.

Wikipedia, Gunpowder Plot

There were no such reprials after the same people, the banking class, destroyed the original World Trade Center. It is a different world now.

I highlighted the 36 barrels of gunpowder and the fact that this was enough explosives to reduce the House of Lords to rubble because that is the whole point. The writers want to make a comparison between the Gunpowder Plot and 9/11. This is 1605; only seven decades have passed since the Jesuits were founded. They are doubtless still loyal to the bankers who installed them in Rome. In other words, this is the Old World bankers attempting to blow up another, equally important building almost four centuries ago. A better analogy could not be found and it serves the dual purpose of identifying who is going to destroy the World Trade Center (the bankers) and who is behind this trilogy of movies (the Ћinkers, who started with Sir Francis Bacon in Elizabethan England).

Even though the meaning of these numbers is brilliant evidence that everything said in the YouTube video BACK TO THE FUTURE predicts 9/11 above is correct, the producers of that video missed it entirely. Why? Because they do not know anything about the history of the Ћinkers. They are in good company though because a quick survey of the Internet shows that in the 36 years since Back to the Future was released, no one has been able to figure out what these two dates mean. I was able to do so in a matter of minutes, not because I am particularly smart, but because I know the importance of what happened in Elizabethan England. I pray the reader takes away from this example a lesson sufficient to inspire them to read and study my page № 53. Sir Francis Bacon and his band of brothers, the Rosicrucian and Freemason secret societies, and to continue this line of inquiry on their own. It does not require you to read or study the Shakespeare plays, only the relevant history of Elizabethan England. Peter Dawkins is a good place to start.

 

PART II. REORG CUT & PASTE

 

Zeus

What follows are fragments of text pulled from older versions of the author’s work WRITTEN IN THE FIRST PERSON. These fragments vary anywhere from a sentence or brief note to entire sections. PLEASE REMEMBER EACH CUT & PASTE IS FROM OLD, UNEDITED WORK THAT MAY INCLUDE ANYTHING FROM INADVERTENT ERRORS TO DANGEROUSLY MISLEADING CONCLUSIONS THAT DESPERATELY NEED TO BE REWRITTEN. “For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little.” But please also note that there is a high probability that the author will not have enough time to rewrite this material before leaving for high ground on December 17, 2022. The reader must exercise some discretion beyond this point.

 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

The runtime of this scene from Tomorrowland is 156 seconds, which is the 911th prime. As discussed below, this explains why the Twin Towers were destroyed on September 11, but for now, watch—no, this is not the right word—study, study as if your life depended on it, the final seconds of this scene.

x

Those are not two legs falling. They are the Twin Towers falling, exactly as you see them falling in BACK TO THE FUTURE predicts 9/11. However, as discussed below, Apophenia Productions missed a ton of stuff. Had they known about the Rosicrucians, they would not have missed so much. And for sure, they would have known why there are multiple references to “Blast from the Past” in Back to the Future. Both movies acknowledge that they are both made by the same people. Think of it as an encryption handshake. Instead, what they did with “Blast from the Past” references in their new BACK TO THE FUTURE [Aliens, Nukes, & Roswell] will tarnish their well-earned reputation.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

PASTE HERE

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

PASTE HERE

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

PASTE HERE

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

PASTE HERE

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

PASTE HERE

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

PASTE HERE

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

PASTE HERE

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

PASTE HERE

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

PASTE HERE

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

PASTE HERE

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

PASTE HERE

 

 

Research Notes


XXX

  • List items